SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David Colvin who wrote (8554)3/28/1999 11:55:00 AM
From: David Colvin  Read Replies (2) of 10072
 
A possible realistic explanation for sale of the Ditto line.

According to page 23 of the 1998 annual report, sales of the Ditto
line have been declining rather dramatically since 1996, especially
from 1997 to 1998.

Ditto Sales (x1000):
1996 - 127,563
1997 - 119,320
1998 - 81,074

Further, the decline in the "product profit margin" was, apparently
even worse.

Ditto Product Profit Margin (x1000):
1996 - 17,148
1997 - 1,852
1998 - (14,309)

There is a rather lengthy explanation for exactly what "product profit
margin" means directly below these numbers in the report. Apparently,
they "carve out" these numbers in a certain way that exposes the true
profit/loss picture (product profit margin) for each line after
certain other expenses are removed from the equation.

Bottom line....when looking at it this way, they barely made a profit
on the Ditto line in 1997, followed by a substantial loss in 1998.
Therefore, retaining the Ditto line would only have resulted in an
ever increasing drag in overall financial performance going forward.

Dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext