SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 493.80-2.7%Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: t2 who wrote (19097)3/28/1999 7:58:00 PM
From: RTev  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
I do not think that Jackson would deliver a verdict without considering how appeals court would deal with it.

Whatever his decision is, he'd write it (or, rather, he'd have his staff write it) very carefully, knowing that it would be reviewed closely by the appeals court. But Jackson would also know that either a pro- or anti-MS decision might be overturned. There are judges on the Circuit Court who are inclined to vote against anti-trust judgments. There are also judges inclined to vote for them. He has no way to know which ones will be looking at his decision, so all he can do is be careful to follow the law and the evidence. Neither one of those seem to favor Microsoft at this point.

Jackson is a Reagan appointee who's probably harder to convince in an antitrust case than another judge might be, but once he's convinced his ego will tell him that he must make the decision. That's his job. He'll let the appeals court do theirs.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext