Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 173.96

+1.4%

Nov 11 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TShirtPrinter who wrote (25446)	3/28/1999 10:01:00 PM
From: Morgan Drake	Read Replies (3) of 152472

No Protracted Legal Fight Recall that the deal was announced after the U.S. Patent Office reaffirmed all 49 of QCOM's patents. Further, Federal Courts defer to agency interpretations and rulings, and except in capital cases, the Federal Appellate Courts are constrained to reviewing matters of law, not factual matters. Thus, once the patent office ruled in favor of Q on all 49 patents (quite a compelling statement), the Federal trial judge in Marshall, TX was bound to rule in Q's favor. And the appellate courts would have affirmed the trial court. So, at that point, ERICY knew the jig was up and threw in the towel. This being the case, I'm sure that Q pretty much dictated the economic terms of the deal, leaving the face saving stuff to ERICY. IMHO.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next