Iomega Thread without Iomega Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Naggrachi who wrote (8601)	3/29/1999 1:01:00 PM
From: Michael M	Read Replies (1) of 10072

Why the trashing of "Dow Jones Reporter?" I hate "journalists" as much as the next guy, but if any of you knuckleheads bothered to call the phone number posted by "Dow Jones Reporter" or checked out the the dj e-mail address, you would have found them legitimate. People around here seem to get extra 'touchy' when we go south of $5 (me too, I guess). If you think the stupid press is kicking your financial butt (and, they are) why not pick up the phone and tell them so instead of whining here. FYI, this stock isn't sliding for no reason. It's been sliding since IOM met with analysts several weeks ago. Do you think the analysts were pleased by what they heard? Quiet period, or no quiet period, IOM, in my opinion, has provided the Big Boys with a 'warning' of sorts. Bet the Q1 number is in the predicted range.....also bet you see revenues in some important areas down (maybe a lot). Expect to hear a lot about how well the "fix" is going. Strictly speculation on my part.....I have no IOM 'sources'. Good luck to all. I will buy a huge additional amount; tons, really, when we get into the threes. Unless Jodie Bore learns something about consumer marketing and/or Clik goes mainstream in a big way, Jodie's out of here by this time next year and IOM is a division of some other outfit (probably around $10). Mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next