Is part of your training in law school to learn how to bully and brow beat people into submission by repeated false attacks? I ask you this again because you have set forth such a pattern of this tactic it can be considered your MO. First with jhild and the qui tam episodes, then here with me in your claiming I said something I did not. You're really not very good at this as I showed you and the public how wrong you were with the qui tam claims by yourself, your claims that I sold my stock for 5cents, and here's yet another incident.
my original post on this matter....
I believe the real truth is that PABN is paying a fee to attend this Microsoft tete-a-tete in Dallas. Why an investor feels a need to paint a different picture, to 'suggest' that PABN is presenting a lecture/seminar directly to Microsoft and that they were selected for this honor is beyond me. Unless.....there was an attempt to mislead. #reply-8569433
you post to David Sirk.....
Colleen even goes on to allude that PABN has been put forth as the presenter and is lecturing directly to Microsoft. No where was that claimed. #reply-8570682
WRONG there .... where did I make such a claim? Please re-read the above.
In this SAME post to David you further say.....
Has she called Microsoft to determine if Larry Roof is manning a booth or presenting as a guest speaker? I have not seen anything here that even remotely suggests that he has. Yet, she wants folks to believe that noone from PABN could possibly be a "Guest Speaker."
#reply-8570682
[[Well, we all know that Larry is not a PABN employee, rather a paid consultant, right? So, is somebody from PABN even attending this event? Please note that this is a new interjection here, I never alluded to this earlier.]]
You also have said that Panam is trying to say that they are in the bigtime because they have a representative presenting at a Microsoft event. #reply-8573693
Wrong again there legalbeagle.. show me where I made such a claim
In this post, I correct the above claim made by you....
Oh, Linda how you love to twist things around. The messages all over the boards (SI, Bull and Yahoo) are that PABN is in the big times now because they have a representative presenting/lecturing at a Microsoft event. Many of these same hyping longs love to throw in Bill Gates' name, as if he's going to be attending this training seminar. This is what I was interested in putting a stop to. This type of commentary by the touting longs is what is ridiculous.
I have never suggested that this was not a good business move. But the notion that he is there to lecture to "Microsoft" is absurd and exactly the type of misrepresentation that should be stopped by over zealous longs.#reply-8571311
and from the above post your run off at the mouth with...
Now Ms. FRAUD, I never said anything about exposure for Panam, now did I? Neither did John, did he? In fact, my point was nothing like you tried to MISREPRESENT, now was it, Ms. FRAUD? We are talking about qualifications here, nothing more. #reply-8585982
Wrong again there counselor, show me where I make such a claim.
then you go on a tirade and repeat this unfounded accusation over and over and over without any basis to back it up other than your continued blustering that I said such a thing. Is this what they teach you in law school, to brow beat the opposition into submission?
You wonder why folks will not discuss the issues with you? Here is an example of where you take a reasonable comment and try to turn it into something it never said. #reply-8585982
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black....you are a classic!
I await your reply with appropriate linked passages to which you may feel support your claims. |
