SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
REFR 1.770+1.1%12:43 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mama Bear who wrote (496)3/30/1999 11:37:00 PM
From: golden_tee   Read Replies (3) of 10293
 
They did not issue junk equity no matter what you'd love to believe. I knock your lie accusations for a loop regarding Zeev's opinion, and you duck the issue, and come back with this BS?
Even Doomsayer, BS "Master B" (Larry) states: The funding "is not an immediate floorless and therefore gives VLNC a window of opportunity to perform and get the stock price to a level that eliminates the possibility of a death spiral. So it is not the worst junk that is out there either." Incidentally, Larry was also convinced that CC would death spiral VLNC after the first phase of financing, and pissed his pants (he likes to do that) when they moved the dates to July, and advanced to the second stage. VLNC had/has many funding opportunities and chose Castle Creek because the terms were favorable for a company about to produce serious revenue. They did not issue "junk equity" where do you get this crap? What dishonesty are you referring too? I make about 100 points, you attack one, (erroneously I might add), and I'm labeled "dishonest"? You wouldn't be short VLNC would you?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext