SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microvision (MVIS)
MVIS 1.030+9.1%10:18 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (2205)3/31/1999 11:26:00 AM
From: icecreambug  Read Replies (1) of 7720
 
>>>First, scanning the photons will not be very helpful, you have to direct the stream of photons on the retina. You also want to sequentially (in time) scan the stream (beam) of photons to different parts of the retina to create the image.

Photons are scanned and directed into the retina. I don't see why you see problem in the statement there.

>>>Second, the claim as written is what we call "inoperative", it implies that a person having only one eye can perceive depth if you could just control the focus of the "scanned photons". Most people familiar with the art know that depth perception is created because two eyes view the same image from slightly different angles. You simply cannot create depth perception in a single eye.

By putting VRD for both eyes and switching right and left images on and off 3D can be achieved. That's different from adding depth information for depth perception. If one VRD can give depth perception, I think it's very good.

I see no problem there.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News