SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Craig Freeman who wrote (53734)3/31/1999 2:25:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 1572776
 
<But it seems a shame not to capitalize on the price of AMD's low-end chips to create PCs more capable than those based upon single, yet more expensive, Intel CPUs.>

I wouldn't be surprised if a startup or two is trying to build multiprocessor K6-III systems right now. Even if the K6-III isn't necessarily geared towards multiprocessing, a chipset can be designed so that two of *any* processor can be made to work in parallel.

The problem with pitting a dual K6-III machine vs. a single Pentium III machine is that you might save money on the processors, but you'll be spending extra money on the dual-processor motherboard vs. the single-processor motherboard. And it's unlikely that the performance of the dual K6-III will be that much more than a single Pentium III. Finally, there are a ton of single-processor Pentium III motherboards out there, giving the guy who's assembling the Pentium III machine much more leeway. The guy who's assembling the dual K6-III machine will likely find an extremely small number of dual K6-III motherboards out there.

In short, it just doesn't make any business sense whatsoever to build multiprocessing K6-III machines to compete against Pentium III machines.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext