Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc.

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joseph Asch who wrote (698)	4/2/1999 9:26:00 AM
From: Bob Davis	Read Replies (1) of 708

Joseph, Thank you for bringing this to my attention. To answer your question, neither myself nor any entity associated with me in any way has received any inducements whatsoever from any source whatsoever for any coverage in The Napeague Letter, or for any other activities whatsoever. In other words - No! I have already made this point in the "Notice" which accompanied my Analysis of PMTI, which reads "I otherwise have no affiliation with this Company, and I am not compensated by it in any way whatsoever." It is of course irrelevant for me to note my coverage of PMTI began well after the end of the applicable period covered by the class action suit. However, it is more relevant for me to note that if PMTI was currently priced at the absurdly high levels prevailing in 1996 and 1997, I would have stated that it was very overvalued by the market, a statement made about several other stocks in this segment. Lastly, I completely understand the tone of your query and I want to assure you that I am not offended by it. Bob Davis The Napeague Letter napeague.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next