SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources - Eric Charters Only!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: average joe who wrote (72)4/2/1999 12:56:00 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (2) of 99
 
An epic stock play, no doubt. the 6000 ton sample has to be at least 300 dollars a carat and one carat per ton. Why not? Because many many shareholders will lose a lot of money of it doesn't.

Turner has built the biggest stalking horse since Troy. But if an army of pillagers burst out of this 6,000 ton horse, don't wake me up in the middle of the night, I have already conceded the city to the rabble.

All WSP is asking is for their fissure vein to be SIX times richer than the average kimberlite in the territories.

I have no problem with that.

But if it is, and the thrust fault continueth, what ho Beniah Lake and poh li'l Rock Resources. Why can't they beat a drum? Is there some reason that geology stoppeth at the mighty gates of Winspear's claim line? Listen, if they can draw large cartoons about mighty mines on 8 foot veins on a 15 degree dip with 1.5 million tons, the analog of which is projetion of a 1.5 ounce grade from sampling two outcrops, if we were a-gold-mining, then I can say that the thrust fault their vein is in continues for thirty miles and has the same geology. The only difference being that my geological projections are on a much firmer footing and have many precedents and authoritative authorship. We can start with W.J. Atkinson for instance. from Australia. The high degree of ignorance (gr.) of other's surrounding potential mirrors C. Fipke's arrogant and fatuous claim that his Diamet, as impressive as it was, had the only diamond potential in the NWT. It also speaks of a suspect insularism on the part of the company with regard to the pedigree of their find.

EC<:-}

EC<:-}
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News