SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (54351)4/3/1999 4:16:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
To All, Barron's review, part 1. Extremely bullish, but otherwise good issue. The quarerly mutual fund results is worth the $3.

1. First, a mea culpa. I knocked Ron Elijah here recently. I hate his style, but after looking at his results, I erred in saying that he had lousy performance. His performance has been spectacular and within the universe of investors who buy stocks stupidly, he is a standout. O.K., not the nicest apology you've ever heard, but not bad from me. <g>

2. An analyst recommends home builders in Abelson's column. We disagree on the future of the economy, but his two picks, Standard-Pacific and Lennar, are goog choices if you don't buy my meltdown theory.

3. In Review and Preview, a Yale economist talks about Dow 100,000 by 2024.

4. In Follow-up, a futurist talks about Dow 41,000 over the next decade.

5. How they gonna do #s 3 and 4? The article, "Time For a Change," gives us a clue. If you don't like the Dow, put in stocks you think will do better. MSFT, INTC, PFE and CSCO are the top candidates. Lunacy.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext