SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: nihil who wrote (33635)4/4/1999 1:01:00 AM
From: Chuzzlewit  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
There were only two souls brave enough to try this one, and I disagree with their answers. I believe the answer is you must always switch, and once you see the reasoning I think the answer will appear simple.

Suppose we label the curtains A, B, and C for convenience. In each case you initially choose curtain A.

Suppose the RR is behind A. Switching will lose.

But suppose the RR was behind curtain B, Monte eliminates curtain C and so you choose curtain B. Switching will win.

Now suppose the RR was behind curtain C, Monte eliminates curtain B and so you choose curtain C. Switching wins.

Another way to think about it:

Initially, the probability of choosing the correct curtain is 1/3. So the probability that the RR is behind one of the two remaining curtains is 2/3. Since Monte always reveals a curtain that does not hide the RR, the probability that it is behind the remaining curtain is 2/3.

Note: revealing that one of the two remaining curtains was a loser does not increase the probability that your curtain (the original guess) was a winner, because there was a 100% chance that at least one of the remaining curtains was a loser.

This is counter-intuitive, but I believe that this is the correct solution.

TTFN,
CTC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext