Ask Michael Burke Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (54547)	4/4/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) of 132070

Michael, I do not disagree with you, I just say these are two separate issues. If they did not have stock buyback (like in the case of TSIG), they would simply print more shares. Robbing share holders with excessive pay and options is one issue, the correct asset management (debt to equity ratio and fiduciary improvement of ROE) including buying back shares when relative returns are higher than what is paid out in debt is another issue. The fact that "correct" asset management tend to mask highway robbery should not negate the practice of correct asset management, it is the highway robbery we should fight. Zeev

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next