SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 33.62-4.2%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Fiondella who wrote (77693)4/4/1999 10:28:00 PM
From: billwot  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Paul _Re: Gates has a controlling interest

MSFT has a current market cap of approx. $468 billion, of which Gates holds about $100 billion-less than 25%. Thats a major interest, but not a controlling interest. (You do remember a guy named Steve Jobs, don't you?) If the value of MSFT shares fall, he (Gates) takes the same proportional loss as any other shareholder.

As to the cost of capital Here is the complete paragraph from your post that I responded to:The truth of the matter is that those who own the means of production actually benefit from wiping out speculative capital from time to time. After the cleansing, new capital costs less and capital shifts to productive investments again.(emphasis mine)

Lets say you have a start-up called pf.com and you need capital for growth. You decided to sell a 50%, interest, say 100,000 shares, in pf.com at an IPO. In todays market, with the DOW bumping at 10k, they might fetch $10 per share, but if you wait for "the cleansiing" and the DOW falls to 7500 you might net $7.50 per share. Now, the question is, if you sold 50% of you company for $1,000,000, or you sold 50% of you company for $750,000, which deal had the "lower capital cost"?

BTW, I had enough undergrad econ hours for a major, and enough graduate hours for a "specialization"( no majors in the MBA program, at least back then), but didn't declare either as I did not need either.

billwot
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext