DD, thank you for the "backing", but really do not think that is necessary or relevant. What I have done in the past is irrelevant, it is what I and others post that counts and people should relay to that, not whether I am short or long, not whether I am an accountant or a technologist, nor whether I am stupid or bright.
I am happy to see that at least part of the criticism I raised relative to Gordon's past performance is starting to sink in. These were facts I pulled out from the company's SEC documents, not whispered hypes and grandiose plans.
When one try to determine the potential success of an enterprise, one of the first question should always be, do they have the financial muscle to execute, right now, this is a major question with TSIG.
Another question should be is the company led by a person that knows how to succeed, this ia another major concern.
A further query should be, is management interested just in their own financial well being or are they planning to do something for their shareholders, I believe that the excessive pay for no performance, granting of free shares in massive amounts and options for 150% more than the then outstanding number of shares are all indication that management is more interested in padding their pockets than in the public stockholders well being.
Zeev |
