That's all very impressive.
If you're so knowledgeable, then why did you state something so obviously incorrect as you did about the insider shares, as listed in the yahoo link you referenced, as being "sold"? And, again, the 2.2 million was an incorrect figure to begin with, as some of those are the same shares - just a renewed 144.
I am not purposely trying to be contentious, it's just that your statements on that issue make no sense whatsoever. Especially coming from an "expert." As well as some others which don't really need to be re-hashed.
It should be added that there was benefit from your presence here, IMHO, as you did force a much closer look at some issues, the options being one.
As to this:
In that connection, last year I have sent via personal selective e-mail, only to people that were engaged with me on the threads (thus qualified as "cyber-acquaintances", if you will), a note to determine their respective interest in getting on the ground floor of such an opportunity.
Over a year ago - yes, over a year ago - I myself received one of your solicitous emails and I didn't know you at all. In fact, I still don't know how the heck you got my email address (which is not the same one I have now). It wasn't in my profile then (and still isn't). |
