Johannes--- I am afraid you are stretching things a bit. You know as well as I that of the 42%, most don't follow the news closely, and had no firm grasp on Clinton's character, and, in any event, it is a poor fall-back from asserting that the American people endorsed his election.
I disagree that withholding a certain punishment is the same as "openly endorsing". Now let's see--- the Democrats are doing their best to muddy the water about the severity of the crimes, and you expect a bunch of people who would find losing their jobs devastating to step up to the plate, despite their fear that a recession would be triggered, which the Democrats have played on, and demand that Clinton be ousted? We are going beyond common- sense, or even charity here.
It is in the nature of a stable democracy that people rarely "take it to the streets"... what are you asking for?
The Senate should have removed the man, but it is a political judgement, too, and it is widely understood that it is not the same as vindication... |
