Not having had billions of income as a result of my millions of shares of YHOO stock, I have to work for a living, per, so I haven't had time to digest the whole report. But in my business "amortization of intangible assets" is always used by CPAs (if their lawyers let them get away with it) as a burial ground for all kinds of unpleasant skeletons. If you have a link to the full report, i'd be grateful if you'd post it, so I can peruse it in detail later tonight, and give you my (obviously, as far as the herd is concerned) my completely stupid, archaic, foolish and worthless opinion of same.
Koogle's mug briefly on CNBC just now; looking good. "It's better to look good than to feel good." Says he has a 91% retention rate among advertisers; is he lying or are all the financial reporters (WSJ, Fortune, CBS.Netwatch, etc.) conspiring to make YHOO look bad? Who's on first? What's on second? Where are Abbott and Costello now when we need them?
Yes, I know, bulls: dead. Just as outmoded as I am, no doubt. Forgive me for thinking, please. It's so much easier to just say Yahoo! and live happily ever after... |
