Kosovo Message Board - Msg: 8774028

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Philosopher who wrote (2618)	4/8/1999 2:34:00 AM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (1) of 17770

<<Not true. The US intentionally and deliberately decided not to seek UN approval of the bombing campaign, as Bush did in Iraq with such success. Clinton knew what the answer would be; he can't bully the UN the way he can bully NATO.>> LOL! Are you aware of who the permanent members of the Security Council are? It practically is NATO: US Britain France Russia China NATO did not go to the UN because Russia and China would have immediately vetoed any resolution. Why would Russia and China do this, especially in light of the fact that Milo probably would have backed down without Russian support? Because Russia and China both have a vested interest in defeating such a measure and in condemning NATO. Politics. Once again I say, Russia could have prevented this before it started, simply by browbeating Milo. They did not, they would have vetoed any SC resolution, and they have profited greatly.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next