Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 165.80

-0.6%

2:10 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (26566)	4/9/1999 12:04:00 PM
From: quidditch	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Jon: I seem to recall from a prior SI or Yahoo post that 5.75% (6% had been mentioned ballpark) was one of the relevant rates. It's not a new number, the question is whether it's accurate. As to the reduction to 4%, first that I've heard of that. Some one else had posted a couple of weeks ago that Q continues to earn royalties notwithstanding that the patent expires--do you have any knowledge of this? Additional questions: In handset sales by Q and by third parties, respectively, what percentage of the handset price (to the distributor/system operator) is attributable to the ASIC, in each case? Rich_Janitor used a $15 pp. Is this ballpark? For longterm Q hagfish, has Gregg, Mq, Art or others ever been aware of difficulties in licensee reporting of royalty bearing sales--i.e., underreporting, delayed reporting, cook books? Q's revenue recognition is in part dependant on its estimates on timing and volumes. Appreciate your input or that of any one else on the board. thank you. Regards. Liacos_samui

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next