Iomega Thread without Iomega Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (8873)	4/9/1999 10:12:00 PM
From: Ken Pomaranski	Read Replies (3) of 10072

<< "BEST research"?! Ken, how can you say that? >> Actually, I said 'some' of the best research ;) << Rocky's posts may occasionally contain facts, but looking for them is like hunting for treasure in a landfill. >> That may be true of some of his 'spin' of the facts, but it is certainly not true of his pointers to real data. Some examples: 1. Who was the first to call SparcQ the Jaz killer. (It was, and it killed Iomega and it's stock in 1998)? 2. Who else (besides myself) pointed out the flaws, with backing data, on the ZIP OEM model? 3. Who first told us about ORB? Superdisk? 4. Who discussed mini-disk & flash vs. CLIK? 5. Who actually read the CLIK! manual? 6. Who poured over the CLIK! datasheet and compared to Flash? 7. LS-120? Click of death? etc.. Fact is, all the above has had a very pronounced negative effect on the stock price, and without him you would have had no idea why... Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to defend him personally, but I just wanted to point out the hyprocracy that goes on here based on one's position on the stock. The fact is: You guys don't like him because he doesn't agree with your perspective. period. kp

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next