SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jim kelley who wrote (56788)4/10/1999 5:23:00 PM
From: rupert1  Read Replies (1) of 97611
 
jim: this is what you actually said two days ago, the day before COMPAQ stated that it will miss its numbers. You said the same things with different word on previous occasions.

So - 4Q you were 55% too low. 1Q you were 55% too high (if 15 cents proves to be the number) I think you need one of those companion F15 with a laser barrel to help you find the target.

___________________________________________________
To: +gene piccoli (56126 )
From: +jim kelley Thursday, Apr 8 1999 10:17PM ET
Reply # of 56795

Gene,

The problem with CPQ is that it has lost its focii.
Thus, I can see that they may make their number this quarter
through various means that we are all now familiar with.

But the quality of their earnings has been deteriorating.
I expect that the deterioration will continue throughout the year.
________________________________________

This is what you said one of those earlier occasions:

______________________

Steven N (53046 )
From: jim kelley
Friday, Mar 12 1999 3:27PM ET
Reply # of 53961

You took it wrong then because I was serious.

My calculations based on the IDC forecast indicates that CPQ can do 31 cents per share
this quarter. Thus they can easily meet the 33 cents per share estimate.


The present value of the stock is about 30-33 dollars per share.

Nothing sarcastic in this message.

_________________________________________________________
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext