Gary, Please check post #145 for clarification...
<What lead to my question is the research I have been doing on DMEC. I see there are debentures and in my opinion, based on what knowledge I have I would say they are NOT in the best interests of an investor.
Sooner or later the stock will most likely be diluted. Now, if you have knowledge to the contrary, please share it. It should be the goal of all to enlighten and share knowledge. If for no other reason than to avoid the tremendous losses that we both know occur daily in the otc-bb markets.>
Don't accuse me of twisting facts or anything else. I have my facts straight; it appears to be bothering you.
My interest in the debenture discussion was not to imply CNHH had debentures. I knew they didn't because I checked the the S-8 filing on the SEC site. I was seeking an opinion. But,you manage to go off the deep end and imagine all sorts of evil I must be up to. Are you okay? I mean are you well, you appear to be coming unglued at the seams.
Please refrain from doing your best to pull me into a personal grudge match you have going with Alan and James. I do not know anything about your dealings with them. I never owned any of the stocks you fight over and I have not posted to those sites. Cut the crap Gary, it won't wash. You only make yourself look foolish. It would help to get your facts straight before taking the next swing at me. ;o) Are you still sipping that Chinese hootch you mentioned last night? ;o) Go easy on that stuff it will rot your brain. <vbg>
I came to the conclusion a long time ago... the best thing that could happen would be if SI threads, all of them,would cease to exist. The only purpose they serve is to create misery for the company and any investor who gets sucked into the emotional hype and bull. If a small company has anything going for it the last thing it needs is SI... IMHO If the company is for real and has something besides hot air behind it then it will succeed in spite of the Internet threads;
not because of some Internet IR, guru or hypster. IMHO
I think Anna, summed it up very well on one of her recent posts, there is NO way to do real due diligence on a otc-bb company because you will only find out what they want to tell you. That is a paraphrase and not and exact quote, but the essence is related. She is dead right. I also saw a statement made by Janice Shell I totally agree with; the DD needs to be done on the officers and insiders not the company and her reasons were the same as Anna pointed out. I agree with both totally and now check out the officers, legal counsel and any other persons connected to the company in whatever capacity they serve and if they check out I advance to the company. What you are buying in an otc-bb stock is not the company or its value but the management. If they have no creditability and have had a brush with the law, then it is time to run fast in the opposite direction.
These are my opinions and what works for me may appear to be over kill to someone else. So each person must decide for themselves how much checking they do on both the company and the faces behind it.
Hind site is always 20/20 we all learn and most of us the hard way. Perhaps, that is best as we are more likely to remember the lessons learned.
Regards,
Dusty
|
