Tell me Pezz... maybe a global war wouldn't be such a bad idea. Or how about a global plague?
Just as nature has its counter-balancing elements entailing predators and prey to sustain the balance, maybe war and pestilence is nature's way of balancing mankind.
Ask yourself why Europe, the US, and most other highly developed economies already have near-zero or negative birth rates in certain racial classes.
Why is that highly developed economies are extremely dependent upon immigration to meet their economic labor requirements??
One of most evident problems is the lack of economic development in these societies, resulting in labor intensive industry and large family units.
If I were a true environmentalist, apparently I would condone not just one child limitations, but actually culling of the human herd.
Were I a true environmentalist, I would be engaging in planned exterminations of entire nations of people who, like a cancer, were polluting the earth through their own cultural, religious, and societal ignorance.
Just who do you plan to prevent from reproducing?? It sure isn't going to be white, anglo-saxons. They already are being marginalized demographically by other cultures.
Who is going to decide just who can and who can't reproduce as they see fit??
I find myself extremely pleased to call myself a pragmatic environmentalist, not a "true environmentalist".
I can't change the world completely. All I can do is mitigate and lessen any damage we do while improving our existence.
Regards,
Ron |
