I do recall multiple pipe emplacements A-21, discovered before 154S, and 154N. Or did that slip your mind as well. The point being is sufficent tonnage was implied prior to Abers mini-bulk sample onset.
Oh, I see. So they became proven resources even before a mini bulk sample was taken. Right. Give it a rest.
Slip my mind as well as what? You're mistaken on all counts to date. Sorry.
A21 was discovered around the same time as A154-South. Hard to say which was first in fact...as you noted below in your message.
A154-North was discovered after A154-South. Drill hole #2 was in the south pipe. Drill hole #3 was in the north.
What does sufficient tonnage being implied have to do with releasing specifics of larger stones, or where the bulk of the value was?
I guess one could say Aber was armed with multiple pipe emplacements going into the mini-bulk samples.
Yes, one could say it. One could not say, however, that Aber was armed with economic pipes going into the mini bulk samples. Please use the same standards when you evaluate each company.
We will see how open Winspear is up to full disclosure, I have requested a full copy. If not I will be contacting the courts for a copy as well.
I might suggest the courts as the best avenue to get your information. Are you familiar with the way a Canadian civil case proceeds?
George...it really is a simple matter to resolve this.
You originally claimed:
Getting to the most important issue, what I have problems reconciling is Winspears lack of total disclosure. I fail to see how they can justify not completely releasing the stone breakdowns in the 200 ton large stone sample. Why would they throw out on the wire the 301US per carat values, then in Jan of 99 suddenly acknowledge that 75% of the parcels value lay in 3 stones.?????????????"
I challenged this statement, by pointing out that Winspear's disclosure from the 200 tonne mini bulk sample was in greater detail than Aber's.
You feel I am wrong. Fine...
Please direct me to the following information on any of Aber's mini bulk samples:
#1. Number of stones larger than one carat.
#2. Sizes of the three largest stones found.
Once again...please direct me to that information.
Have a great day,
Will |
