SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (8881)4/12/1999 10:03:00 AM
From: Nadine Carroll   of 10072
 
Ken,

I think Allen and Michael have done a good job of answering the points in your previous posts.

I myself would call Rocky's posts a mixture of 20% fact, 70% spin always supporting one pre-ordained conclusion (Iomega is doomed) and 10% outright lies when there are no convenient facts at hand.

I do not think that is a credible or honest mixture and I have stopped reading most of his (their?) posts.

Which is not to mention the emotional tone of the posts: Rocky whines and gloats and harangues, often in the same post. He displays a remarkable mixture of petulance and arrogance.

So it is not fair to say "The fact is: You guys don't like him because he doesn't agree with your perspective. period."

Your posts have been equally bearish and have been treated respectfully (mostly) because your posts have been rational and credible.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News