I've actually done that in the past, JBL. But to repeat, I'm into a more pro-active stance in the pointless insult department these days. Why should I bother when I'd get the same crap in return, regardless? It's been well establish in this fetid forum, by such astute students of substantive debate as yourself, among many, many others, that if you're not an outright Clinton hater, you're a Clinton lover, or idolater, or whatever. On the other side of the coin, if you don't profess your love of Ronbo and dare raise the subject that St. Reagan was perhaps showing symptoms of Alzheimer's long before the official diagnosis was made public, you hate all Republicans. It's so tricky navigating the world of moral absolutes, unless you take your dogma straight up from Neo-con or something.
Anyway, when did Starr appoint all you guys deputy prosecutors in the inquisition? I can guarantee you that nobody asked me to be Clinton's defense attorney or anything else. Why, exactly, is it that I'm supposed to be obligated to answer all the stupid "when did you stop beating your wife" questions that get sent my way? I'd be happy to do it in a conventionally "secret" grand jury proceeding, if called. Of course, the conventional notion of "secret" never much seemed to apply to Starr's grand juries. That was all Clinton's fault too, right, JBL? Just like the decline of Western Civilization in general. |
