SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3DFX

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Marc who wrote (11702)4/12/1999 6:09:00 PM
From: Michael G. Potter  Read Replies (1) of 16960
 
Marc,

Sorry, I thought that you were joking back at me when I saw the ASCII picture format of your post to me. I use <grin> to indicate that I'm smiling when I type a line in a response. Since you cannot hear my voice or see my facial expressions or read my body language, I use it to say I'm not that serious or I'm poking a little fun.

You asked me why no comment on the rise (did I first post in this thread July of last year or something). Anyways, I think you expected me to be posting a gloating e-mail about the rise or something about how I broke even since the stock was finally back to where I bought it first. I replied with worries and questions, not great joy, and asked you if it was the type of answer you were expecting (with the <grin> to indicate that I was joking so you wouldn't take offense to the exact words I was using).

In case you're wondering, I barely bought anything around when I first started posting. I'm doing well enough on the shares I bought much afterwards. I'm not focussed on the rise, though, I'm more eager about the future. I wouldn't buy a stock like this unless I thought it had a good chance to greatly increase. A decent size OEM or two would be a good confirmation of my expectations for the stock.

Michael

sad because the Habs are eliminated
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext