International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ddl who wrote (34801)	4/13/1999 11:22:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) of 35569

Denis, <<results indicated the whole area to be fairly uniform.>> IPM using their assays, they did show a general background of 0.03-0.05 OPT, but the higher grades are in the channels. I think that IPM hit a high grade pluton at one time (higher grades), but don't remember the details. Maxam shows 0.05 OPT SFA randomly drilling also, but has occasionally hit some of the high grade paleo-channels. The Maxam problem was also a little easier than IPM's because Maxam is mostly a gold play while IPM was focusing on PGMs. <<1opt proven>> Standard fire assay, but not COC. COC for that Maxam mapping drill program will be reported soon, proof.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next