International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ddl who wrote (34801)	4/13/1999 12:22:00 PM
From: TrueScouse	Read Replies (3) of 35569

Denis and Richard: As you can see, I'm still lurking on the IPM site. Can't resist it! <<according to their results indicated the whole area to be fairly uniform.>> IPM may have indicated this in one or other of their PR's, but the results were far from uniform throughout the whole area. Somewhere on my computer I have a spreadsheet that I created from the original data posted on the IPM website -- i.e. the tests of the 1 sq. km. grid to 100 ft depth. They varied a lot from drill hole to drill hole and according to depth. The average of all the figures was something like 0.043 opt -- I don't remember exactly -- and that average was being used to extrapolate possible ore figures. I still have no idea whether or not these numbers were for real or if they had been fabricated a la Bre-X. But they varied from hole to hole in a very convincing manner! If you're interested I'll try to find them and take another look. Regards, Howy

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next