<If your answer to either of these questions is no, then you are attacking me without the slightest clue as to what the discussion is about. This is becoming a common pattern for you Rookie.>
I'm getting sick and tired of this. You post false messages like "3DNow provides the same benefits as SSE," when the facts state that 3DNow can't even help the K6-III outperform a Celeron in games. Then when I attack you for posting falsehoods, you then try and impress me with your age and experience while calling me a "rookie."
<Are you aware that the graphics cards you mentioned do not have geometry hardware on board?>
Trying to change the subject now, Scumbag? We were talking about the present, not the future. The truth is that I don't know how on-board geometry hardware will change the processor arena. I don't know what benefits it has and how SSE, 3DNow, Pentium III, K6-III, or K7 can help or hurt. You probably know more than I do.
But the fact is that right now, at this time, no graphics cards that's available for consumers have on-board geometry engines. And no games right now support these kinds of cards even if they were available. I'm commenting on end-user results in the present, which show that even the K6-III can't hold a candle to the Celeron when it comes to 3D games. What are you talking about, future garbage man?
Tenchusatsu |
