Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 35.53

-1.1%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scumbria who wrote (78866)	4/13/1999 6:56:00 PM
From: ericneu	Read Replies (1) of 186894

The point of my original post rookie was that a Celeron with a T+L graphics card will beat a PIII and probably cost less. What is your answer to that oh objective one? Scumbria --- Your point boils down to: Celeron + non-existent T+L graphics card > PIII So what? How about this: PIII + T+L graphics card > Celeron + T+L graphics card Neither is terribly meaningful. What if the first generation of T+L accelerators suck? What if they're too expensive? What if games are being written to APIs that don't take advantage of hardware T+L acceleration? Etc, etc. - Eric

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next