SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : London Pacific Group - LPGL doubles...

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Patherzen who wrote (86)4/14/1999 2:57:00 PM
From: Bo Le  Read Replies (1) of 737
 
Read LPGLY news release you will find out that they now report un-realized gain as income which make their PE looks low. In the past, only when their investment sold, they count profits (if any) as income. WCAP is doing the same thing. That's why a lot of people think WCAP will earn $4 a share next Q (because they own 90000 shares WGAT whcih will go IPO this week). PWCC just relaesed Q report showing an un-realized gain of $21 million (from FLAS, of course). Using LPGLY's accounting, this $21 million can be considered as income, which is equal $7 a share. Then PWCC PE will be less than 3.
So which one is better, LPGLY or PWCC?

BL
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext