Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 173.60

+0.1%

Dec 30 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Clarksterh who wrote (27121)	4/15/1999 11:38:00 AM
From: DaveMG	Read Replies (1) of 152472

Actually it is not. Qualcomm said very explicitly that any harmonization between the 'modes' is now in the hands of the operators. Mika didn't claim that Qualcomm got nothing, just that they didn't get one of the things that they were originally after - the 3.68 chip rate etc. Yes but I think Dr J believes he will end up with a lot of what Q was looking for, ie standards which are close enough so as not to be an enormous headache, that operators will force it. Mika also suggests the chiprate will remain 4.096Mcps, which is of course what ERICY is saying.. I think if you look at that list of licensees I posted you'll see that a good many of them are Japanese companies. NTT will be telling all these companies to shove it if they adopt an approach which is very difficult for these companies to adapt to and which gives European companies an advantage. Why should they do such a thing?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next