SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: cicak who wrote (25467)4/15/1999 1:17:00 PM
From: REW  Read Replies (2) of 44908
 
Phil,

This was a further response. This was MY response. Additionally.
THERE IS NO DISCUSSION IN TSIG ABOUT THIS THAT I KNOW OF.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
First, in additional response to those that can't read. I'll make it bigger. Look close.

THERE IS NO REVERSE SPLIT BEING CONSIDERED OR HAS BEEN CONSIDERED
OR IS GOING TO BE CONSIDERED BY TSIG. THIS COMES FROM MY ASKING MANY
DIFFERENT TIMES OVER THE PRIOR MONTHS OF BOTH ROBERT GORDON AND
PAUL HENEY SEPARATELY. AGAIN THERE WILL BE NO REVERSE SPLIT BY TSIG TO
RAISE THE STOCK VALUE AND LOWER THE SHARE COUNT.

I am so greatful for non-invested questioners. Especially those who lacked the confidence to
maintain their positions even in the fog clearing stance TSIG is in. That lack of confidence
combined with the obvious caring exuded toward the continuing shareholders in/of TSIG
questions your motivational reasonings.

I would have thought my mention of the possible, not probable, considered reasons for a
form of reverse would have been taken as a positive move. These two methods are value
enhancing prospects to the shareholders. These actions can and may be also done with no
split. I see the value of TSIG preparing just fine. I only answered a question or inquiry toward
someone indicating the possibility which I thought I placed a strong denial.

One places TSIG directly on the NASDAQ and immediately moves it from the numbing
valuations of the BB world to the overly elevated PEs of the NAZ. This would most likely be a
reverse merger, not split, tied to the purchase of a NASDAQ listed company. Oh, and TSIG
will have a PE. The action would be such that the investor would go to bed one night on the
BB and wake up the next day on the NASDAQ. Let recognition bring the attention of
investors and institutions and the maybe PE of 20 on the BB would move to the 100+PEs of
the NAZ. Everyone see the advantage? Howard, can you understand?

Now the other. Say a strategic investor wants to invest, at market or a premium, in TSIG.
They take a solid percentage, 20% seems used a lot. That throws a LOT of cash into TSIG
at once. Stipulation from the large powerful investor. We will put you on the NASDAQ but we
want you to reverse to get the maximum effect. TSIG gets a lot of money and a NAZ listing.
Any problems with that? Think about it. Look better that the first common example? Do the
math.

This reverse thing has been allowed to get such a negative conotation to it that noone
seems to recognize the good that can come from the mechanism. It just needs to be used
properly and for the right reasons. The two brief examples above should indicate that.
Enough said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Damn guys, get a grip. Make a response to an idiot and get heat.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News