SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IBM
IBM 289.94-2.5%Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Arrow Hd. who wrote (4919)4/15/1999 2:13:00 PM
From: Jules B. Garfunkel  Read Replies (2) of 8218
 
Arrow and All,
I posted this on the INTC thread, but I thought you, and all here, would also appreciate reading the post.
Message 8920703
Regards,
Jules
========================
Harry and All,
I find it rather ironic that INTC should be down today, (-3 1/2 @ 57). For more than 2 years I have complained of IBM's poor quality of earnings. I have watched their stock go up, sometimes 7 points in a day, after they made their analyst's estimated earnings numbers by buying back stock and reducing their tax rates for the Quarter. At times these two items alone have accounted for $.12 to $.19 cents per share per quarter, (Q after Q).

Yet, INTC reports one Quarter's earnings on Tuesday,(beating estimates by $.02, with higher than expected GP Margins), but the earnings included a $.02 a share contribution from sold securities...(in a Q when these securities were at all time highs), and a $.01 contribution from a lower tax rate, and INTC's stock goes down 3 1/2 points, after the day before's 5 point drop.

Where is the rationality?
Is it because analysts who follow INTC do not speak to the analysts who follow IBM?
Jules

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext