SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: s. bateh who wrote (9111)4/15/1999 5:18:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid  Read Replies (2) of 10072
 
>>>Jodie feels the potential of clik is "larger than zip".....very upbeat on clik.....<<<

They have to be. It's the only thing left to be optimistic about. . But the measly 2.8 Tie ratio won't cut it. It's just what I said all along... people will use Flop! disks over and over and over again to avoid the costs of film. Else, why bother with it? Just stay with film if you're going to buy media after media after media.

Revenues are still falling steadily year to year.

Jaz is dying again with no SparQ...it's CD-RW that's killing it off. No way for Jaz to compete. Say good-bye to even more Jaz revenue 2nd Q.

Flop! drive debut abysmal. $5 Million debut didn't cut it, folks. I've been saying that Flop! will contribute less than $30 Million in total revenue for Iomega during its entire lifetime. And it looks like I'm going to be right once again

THis is a shrinking company. Ditto sliced off along with its $80 Million in annual revenue, Jaz looks like it's soon to follow. Flop! only contributing $5 Million is revenue (cost probably well over $100 Million to develop). It's a sad sad day in Roy.

The Bull's position just doesn't make sense. And this 1st Q 99 Report proves it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext