SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rocky Reid who wrote (9109)4/15/1999 5:18:00 PM
From: David Harker  Read Replies (1) of 10072
 
All - looks like Zip is becoming the main product.
Here is a breakdown of zip vs. jaz revenues 1Q 98 vs 1Q 99,
amounts in $ millions:

Zip Jaz (Z+J Rev) TotalRev
--- --- --------- --------
1998 267 110 377 408
(65%) (27%) (non Zip/Jaz rev = 31, 8%)

1999 302 63 365 386
(78%) (16%) (non Zip/Jaz rev = 21, 6%)
(5 of the 21 was Clik)

It is VERY important that the flagship, "biggest name" product
is doing so well - the 39% increase in Zip disk sales and 44%
growth in Zip drive sales is the key! They are shipping
almost a million Zip drives per month.

Operating costs are reduced from 32% of revenues in 1Q98
(131/408) to 23% of revenues in 1Q99 (91/386). That means
Operating costs are now only 69.5% of what they were in 1Q98.
(91/131).

With costs falling and Zip sales growing at 39-44%, the bottom
line will grow nicely in the future. Clik is a wildcard that
may help, but Zip is where the $$ will come from. As for Jaz,
the 1998 Annual Report describes a lessening focus on that product,
as user surveys found it was mainly appealing to a professional
market, not a consumer market. So, they are reducing efforts
to sell it to consumers, to save $. The zip is growing well,
and can carry the company if the trends describe above continue.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext