SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mani1 who wrote (55656)4/15/1999 7:39:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) of 1579459
 
<OEM's will offer the K7 if it can make them more money. That is all there is to it. If customers want the performance of the K7, OEM will offer it. This is not complicated.>

Notice the key word "if" there. Scumbria mentioned that the worst case scenario for the K7 is that it matches the performance of the Pentium III, and I agree. But I also argue that this worst-case scenario is very bad for AMD, because that means that AMD won't be able to sell the K7 at $500.

I'll bet reality is a little better than this, though. I don't expect the Pentium III to exceed 550 MHz at the time of the K7 launch. And I'll bet that the K7 is at least a little faster than the K6-III in integer performance, meaning that even at 500 MHz it's bound to be a little faster than a Pentium III 550 MHz.

Oh well. At least the K7 volume will only be a trickle in Q3, Q4, and Q1 2000, and the Pentium III is still safe.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News