Washington Post article on Net funds. A serious error needs to be noted, however. Several references are made to the "Fidelity Select Net Fund", which caused a frenzy of confusion. There's no such fund, the author mistakenly called another Fidelity Select Tech fund by that name. Shocking to notice the avg. stock fund returned 1.63% the 1st qtr while the Net funds returned approximately 100% in the same period.
The article's below, but he are my fav quotes:
"In the next three to six months you're going to see several major companies announce Internet funds, because that's where the cash is going," said Alpha Research's O'Leary. "They're seeing that not only hasn't the Internet bubble blown up, but it's continuing to new highs."
"Managers that were long disdainful of Internet and high-tech stocks are now holding their noses and buying them," [Morningstar Analyst Christine] Benz said.
"People are getting greedy," Lapman [a fund manager] said
=== Is the Gold Rush Headed for Grief? Investor Stampede to Internet Stocks Is Drawing Money Out of Rest of Market, Weakening the Will to Diversify
By Ianthe Jeanne Dugan Washington Post Staff Writer Sunday, April 4, 1999; Page H01
Jerry McCarthy, 72, has never used the Internet. He doesn't even own a computer. But after hearing that his 10-year-old grandson plotted an upcoming family trip from New Hampshire to Alaska online, he shifted his individual retirement account into a mutual fund devoted to Internet companies. "This Internet thing is going to change the world," said McCarthy, who recently sold his Nashua, N.H., insurance business. "I'm in." Over the years, McCarthy has picked many of his own stocks, such as Coca-Cola Co. and General Electric Co. But he was stumped over how to measure firms being fueled by the Internet. So he invested $25,000 in Monument Internet Fund, managed by Bethesda's tiny Monument Funds Group.
The investment, so far, has paid off. The obscure fund, with $14.5 million in assets, was the third-best-performing stock fund in the United States in the first quarter, with a 92 percent return to shareholders, according to Lipper Analytical Services Inc., a New York firm that tracks mutual fund performance. Just ahead of it, in second place, was a rival the Internet Fund, a much bigger New York upstart run by a staff of two, which returned 93 percent.
Number 12, with a 54 percent return, is Munder's NetNet fund, which in just one year has grown from $6 million in assets to $1.4 billion. Also among the top 25 performers is WWW Internet Fund, which gained 35 percent.
The performance of these Net-devoted funds is an extreme demonstration of a trend that has been developing for three years: Investors who pour money into a handful of household names--which now include Internet stocks--are doing well. Funds devoted to small-company stocks, mid-size companies and seeking out undervalued stocks, by comparison, are performing poorly. Last year, the average stock lost 20 percent of its value, while the Standard & Poor's index of 500 stocks rose 28 percent.
"The reason most mutual funds are underperforming is that a new industry--an electronic frontier--has developed that is sucking money out of the rest of the market," said David O'Leary, chief executive of Alpha Equity Research. "If you're not in these stocks, you're underperforming."
All told, the 6,200 U.S. stock funds (total assets of $2.5 trillion) returned a paltry 1.63 percent in the first quarter. Small-company funds dropped 5.98 percent, while growth funds grew 4.36 percent. Funds that track the S&P 500 grew 4.79 percent. Science and technology funds, which include the Internet funds, returned 17.04 percent.
"The foundation of the investment business for years has been diversification, but now investors are asking why do I need it," said Avi Naknami, chief executive of Strategic Insights, a New York mutual fund consulting firm. "They see that if they invest in 15 large companies they'll do better. We're in an eerie period in the investment business in which the core value of what the investment industry offers is being challenged."
Now the Internet is bringing the divergence to a new extreme. Even portfolios full of the stocks that drive the Dow Jones industrial average higher, such as General Electric and AT&T Corp., are being humbled by funds that are heavy on the high-tech and Internet stocks that are defying gravity.
As a result, many fund managers are beginning to load up on Internet stocks--and funds devoted to the Internet are proliferating. Van Kampen has $1 billion in a unit investment trust devoted to Internet stocks. And Fidelity recently launched an ad campaign touting its Select Net Fund, which focuses on computer and software firms, as a safe door to the Internet craze. Sources at Fidelity said the company is even contemplating opening an Internet-specific fund, but a spokesman denied that.
"In the next three to six months you're going to see several major companies announce Internet funds, because that's where the cash is going," said Alpha Research's O'Leary. "They're seeing that not only hasn't the Internet bubble blown up, but it's continuing to new highs."
Many analysts say that buying into mutual funds devoted to Internet stocks is highly risky. The ride to prosperity has been volatile, and it is impossible to measure the potential return.
"There's more bang for the buck in pure Net funds, but over time, with it being such a volatile area and so many fund managers skeptical, I would tend to steer investors toward more balanced technology funds," said Christine Benz, a senior analyst at Morningstar Inc., which measures fund performance. "If anything, they should invest in tech funds that have only 10 percent to 15 percent in Internet stocks."
Many start-up funds flew off the charts in the first quarter, dwarfing the performance of the biggest and oldest mutual funds. Fidelity Magellan Fund, heaving in America Online Inc., Intel Corp. and Cisco Systems Inc., posted a return of 7.01 percent in the first quarter. Just a year ago would have been considered healthy. But it does not look good next to Amerindo Technology, which returned 67 percent even without being a pure Internet fund.
Magellan was up 33 percent last year. Of that, 3 percent alone was America Online, which jumped from $22 a share to $155, O'Leary said. An additional 2 percent was due to Cisco Systems holdings. "Magellan's outperformance last year was the result of the Internet," O'Leary said. "Anybody who didn't play it underperformed."
Consider the plight of Mark Lapman, who runs Independence Investment Associates, which manages a $30 billion portfolio for John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. It was performing in line with the S&P 500--until the index added America Online near the end of last year. Suddenly, Hancock's portfolio, which is full of large company stalwarts and light on high-tech stocks, was lagging by nearly one-third a percentage point.
"People are getting greedy," Lapman said. "And it's becoming harder than ever to bring down the expectations of investors."
Lapman did add more AOL to counterbalance the fund, following a path into Internet stocks that is being blazed by more and more portfolio managers. "Managers that were long disdainful of Internet and high-tech stocks are now holding their noses and buying them," Benz said.
But choosing the right Internet company to put in a portfolio is a challenge, because they have no track record and no earnings. "We have to use a matrix that has never been used before," said John Porter, portfolio manager of Fidelity's Select Net. "But it's like the gold rush--and we want to find the next Levi's and pick-axes."
The biggest fund devoted to Internet stocks is Munder Capital Management's NetNet Fund, which captures every aspect of the Internet. Included in the portfolio are Sun Microsystems Inc. and other companies that provide hardware to traditional corporations that are benefiting from the Net, such as Charles Schwab & Co., which now conducts half its business online, to the Gap Inc., which has vast online potential.
"If all of us could look back two years and invest, we'd invest in Internet stocks," said Paul Cook, the leader of Munder Capital's five [spacer]portfolio managers. "Maybe in five years, we'll look back and say now was the right time."
Still, Cook is conservative in his optimism. "Don't put more than 10 to 15 percent of your assets into Internet funds," he advised.
Cook in 1996 struggled to persuade Paul Tobias, chief executive of Birmingham-based Munder, to open the fund. Tobias recalls giving Cook $500,000 in seed money "to reward a top portfolio manager." But skeptical teasing ensued.
Cook has gotten the last laugh. In the last year, the fund has grown nearly 12,000 percent, to $1.4 billion.
Sometimes, a gambling instinct is necessary in this game. When Ryan Jacob, now 29 years old, became portfolio manager for the Internet Fund in late 1997, he dropped some of the established players in the industry such as Cisco, Microsoft Corp. and Intel and instead focused on the hot new prospects. The fund has stocks in about 35 companies, including America Online, Excite Inc., Double Click Inc. and Yahoo Inc., which rose 584 percent last year. The fund was also fueled by CMGI Inc., which was up 604 percent after its sale of GeoCities stock in an initial public offering. "It's not unusual that the companies we have grow 30 percent to 50 percent per quarter," Jacob said.
The Internet Fund's assets swelled from $200,000 to $30 million in a year, as investors tried to get in on its stellar returns--196 percent last year.
But it has been a bumpy ride. After soaring 90 percent during the first half of last year, the fund lost more than half its value during the summer lulls.
Jacob remains humbled by the experience. "Most companies are priced for success," he said. "Not everyone will get there. Some will fall by the wayside."
For now, the companies' stock prices are being pushed up, giving companies devoted to them a fast ride. "The Internet is the future of commerce," said Lawrence York, chief executive of WWW Internet Fund in Lexington, Ky.
This quarter, WWW Internet returned 35 percent to shareholders in three portfolio sectors--adolescent, midlife and mature. Adolescent choices include AOL and Amazon. Considered midlife are companies such as Adobe Systems Inc., Cisco and Compuware Corp. And in the mature category are companies such as Compaq Computer Corp., Intel, Microsoft and Sun Microsystems.
One of the youngest of the Internet funds is Monument Funds, which touts itself as a broad-based Internet fund that invests in companies that provide the framework as well as commerce online. "Lots of companies are behind the headline companies--people who lay cables, provide security, content, get signal down to your house and the router," said David Kugler, a former Merrill Lynch & Co. stockbroker who founded Monument.
The concept was to market the new economy--and also get some attention. "How does a tiny place distinguish itself?" he asks.
The fund follows 43 companies, with America Online accounting for a full 4.5 percent of the portfolio's value. Monument Funds has $35 million in assets. The Internet portion, launched in November, accounts for $13 million.
He, too, learned quickly about the risks of the sector. In a week after it began, it soared to $12.06 and then went down to $10.22, during a post-Thanksgiving Internet slump.
"It's crazy," Kugler said. "It can be very painful. But I believe that over the long run, this is going to be the place to be."
That is the philosophy of McCarthy, the New Hampshire investor. His grandfather at the turn of the century laughed at a friend who encouraged him to buy into Bell Telephone. A few years later, the friend advised him unsuccessfully to buy into automobiles.
"He thought it was a fad, utter foolishness," McCarthy said. "He put it in the bank, and along came the Depression." McCarthy did not want to repeat that mistake. "It's impossible to measure it the way you measure the steel industry," he said. "But I know it's the wave of the future."
A Hot Quarter for Internet Funds
Internet funds have far outpaced the S&P 500 and Wilshire 5000 indexes.
FUND (top holdings)
TICKER
NET ASSETS*
Return, Annually
1997 1998
Munder NetNet: 800-438-5789
(CNET, Sun Microsystems, Intel, AOL, Microsoft)
MNNAX
$1.4 billion
30.4% 97.9%
Internet Fund: 888-386-3999
(CMGI, Yahoo, Double Click, Allou Health & Beauty Care, Lycos)
WWWFX
$300 million
12.7% 196.1%
WWW Internet: 888-263-2204
(Ascend Communications, Checkfree Holdings, Compaq Computer, Qualcomm, Motorola)
WWIFX
$20.7 million
0.5% 70.5%
Monument Fund: 888-420-9950
(AOL, RealNetworks, CMGI, Double Click, Broadcast.com)
MFITX
$14.5 million
** **
*as of March 31
SOURCES: Lipper Analytical, Morningstar, Bloomberg News, Monument Fund
**Monument Fund inception date: Nov. 4, 1998
Year-to-date returns (through March 31)
Internet Fund 93%
Monument 92%
Munder NetNet 54%
WWW Internet 35%
S&P 500 5%
Wilshire 5000 3%
© Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company ===
- Netconductor.com
|