SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT
GSAT 63.18-1.8%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mr. Adrenaline who wrote (3924)4/16/1999 1:33:00 PM
From: Jeff Vayda  Read Replies (2) of 29987
 
Mr A. If I may ask a follow on question to your comment:

As for Globalstar, the satellites launched in to a 900 km orbit have 7 ½ years of fuel. But for those (like on the Delta) that get launched into a higher orbit, their fuel reserves is much, much greater. That is because the fuel is used not only for orbit keeping once on station, but also orbit raising after launch.

From this may I infer that the Soyuz then launches to a lower orbit, and therefore is inferior to a Delta wrt propellant costs? (satellite useful life) Was this part of the reasoning for the lumbering Zenit - a higher altitude launch capability?

Just how large are the differences? Same day launch on one rocket verses another results in how many months delta useful life?

Thanks

Jeff Vayda
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext