SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 83.43-4.3%10:42 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (18810)4/16/1999 6:38:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
I've all heard this before. PC's are turning into a sub-$500 commodity. Inertia will keep SDRAM king for a long time, etc., etc. The PC users out there who demand more and more performance are nothing more than a 20% "niche."

There are only two arguments against the widespread use of RDRAM as I see it:

1) Licensing, royalty, and marketing issues

2) No one but the 20% "niche" needs a faster computer

I don't know much about the issues surrounding argument #1, so I'll avoid talking about it for now.

But argument #2 is the same old song all over again. The skeptics don't realize that it's this 20% "niche" that pretty much dictates what the 80% "mainstream" will be using in the following years. (I remember a time when the Pentium was first introduced, and the skeptics were saying that no one really needs more than a 486.) The emergence of sub-$500 PC's isn't going to stop progress. Rather, it's only going to delay the inevitable, which is that even sub-$500 PC's will be employing next-generation DRAM technologies sooner or later (probably later).

In other words, the question shouldn't be "Will we need next-generation DRAM technology like RDRAM?" Rather, the question should be "Which next-generation DRAM technology will we all be using, and when?"

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext