Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (42496)	4/17/1999 2:44:00 PM
From: Linkdog	Read Replies (1) of 95453

Slider-- I commend your strategy and the way you have battled back from what I perceive to be devasting losses in 2nd, 3rd quarters of last year. At the same time, I think that it may be time buy and hold the mid/small caps in the sector to at least the November highs. My profit taking point on FLC is $16. At that time I will reevaluate and perhaps rotate into a smaller cap laggard. This strategy is a must for me since I am a restricted from trading a stock more than once every 60 days by my employer. While I agree that the SLBs, HALs and CAMs of the worl may be ahead of themselves for the moment still see upside for the smaller boys. Per FLCs preferred offering -- had some time to think about it last night. I am viewing it as a positive. What we have here is that a large (legendary per Big Dog) investor has plunked down a $300 million bet on FLC for the next 5 years. The preferreds are callable, not convertible. Max dilution is 10.5 million shares plus PIK shares paid as "interest" over the next 5 years. However, you have to net out the $97 million cash FLC would receive upon exercise of the warrants. Overall, I believe the Street took this as "positive" since this guys $300 million is behind all of the debt in a liquidation. I view this as nothing more than a very sophisticated investor plunking down $300 million to take a large equity stake in the company. Yes he is ahead of us little old common shareholders but if he didn't think there was value to the assets and that the company wouldn't due well I can't see why he would pay $300 million for 0% return for the next 5 years. Any thoughts???

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next