SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mooter775 who wrote (10502)4/17/1999 7:02:00 PM
From: MGV  Read Replies (3) of 27311
 
You embarrass yourself, both with your after the fact detail and your assumptions. To boot, you misrepresent. I'll start there.

"Tout" is your self-serving word. It was only after someone on this thread noticed that MIKL was among the good performing stocks I've consistently represented as my favorite stocks that they mentioned it here first. After being challenged, I explained the fundamental differences between MIKL and VLNC. Look it up, the record is on the thread. Now, even someone with the lack of integrity and questionable motives as you would understand the difference between explaing fundamentals after being challenged and active touting as you and kellett do so shamefully. for the record, I also was challenged about CKFR, which at the time had a poor stock performance (but not company performance) and since has more than quadrupled since August 1998. It is notable that you nor any of the other VLNC hacks that reference MIKL choose to mention CKFR (or any of the others that have done very well).

Second, because I don't make up information about a hypothetical portfolio as you apparently do and I take the position that a public thread is not an appropriate forum for details about anyone's portfolio (and in fact common sense dictates that it is not a reasonable matter to do so) I would never detail personal transactions. There is no legitimate reason to do that. There are many illegitimate and dishonorable reasons to do so. That explains your alleged portfolio transactions. Now, in the short run, your dishonesty and lack of discretion has an advantage over my honesty and discretion because you can make up anything. Over the long run, the performance of the fundamentally atrocious companies you tout will expose you.

Third, you have consistently been wrong about VLNC. In July, after representing that you were very close to VLNC, you "predicted" that a contract would be announced in August. Later you pushed it back to September, then later, October. Later you said January. You have no pride and you dishonor the people you write to by assuming they are too gullible to catch the holes in your stories.

Fourth, don't assume anything about my investment style. You can be sure of only what I say. Don't try to guess about things that I don't represent. That means you can only be sure that I own the stocks that I represent as my favorites. That also means don't assume that I have a buy and hold strategy for all stocks I own at all times. If you have to assume something, assume that my portfolio outperforms yours. With that at least, you can expect to be right.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext