SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: E. Charters who wrote (3126)4/17/1999 11:29:00 PM
From: RJ2  Read Replies (1) of 3744
 
Mr. Charters, I was just wondering, when Harris adopted this land proposal, it was in Sudbury with the prez of Inco. As you might recollect I have been known to be a Flagster Fan from the region 30
miles northeast of the big nickel. The drilling is continuing, geophysics still happening and as far as I know most parties are involved in some sort of agreement of this PGM/base metal play. If say the igneous intrusive is found beside their 1500 feet dessimated discovery hole would you think the government and other interested parties let a project of that magnitude slip though fingers? Not only would it create additional revenues (tax,jobs) it might substantually increase to the moonscape of that region of the province. E Charters if a major discovery happens in Sudbury area again (1.8 billion tonnes of ore) Inco and Falconbridge (1889-1999), would that be a large enough find to revive the mining industry in the heartland and pear down the need for mining in elsewhere in the province?? I'm not including some of they other mining camps that have been discovered and are still ongoing concerns due to the simple fact the Sudbury intrusive is the cock of the block in Ontario for size and longivity. Do I have a grasp of the Lands for Life senerio or not??
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext