VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (10518)	4/18/1999 12:34:00 PM
From: MGV	Read Replies (2) of 27311

You had several points Zeev. None of them were missed. Regarding the one you chose to highlight, you know that in the absence of good corporate-sourced news from VLNC, people appear to rely on several sources who write on this thread as if they have special source information. This alleged special source information differs from the company reports and it consistently has been wrong. From Wolanchuk to mootie to kellett, there has been inaccurate representations cloaked in suggestions that the representations are based on "special knowledge." (In the case of Wolanchuk, the inaccurate representations are hearsay based on statements made here by VLNC apologists who attribute statements to him) This fact is not in dispute. Numerous people have identified it here. So, when people "concentrate on VLNC and its prospects or lack thereof" it is important to realize that they have reason to be highly skeptical of the mooties and kelletts when they suggest, implicitly or otherwise, that they know something different than what has been publically reported by VLNC through legal channels.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next