SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jeffbas who wrote (6804)4/18/1999 4:40:00 PM
From: Michael Burry  Read Replies (3) of 78530
 
Re: VAR

Since the published numbers in the databases mean nothing, I compiled
my own based on pro forma numbers for VAR and recent reports by
several cos identified as being in the same industry/competitors by
VAR's investment bank. I'll post them here to support what I said
about being willing to buy VAR at a little cheaper prices.

VAR ADAC BCR OXE SLMD
P/B 3.8 1.9 4.8 3.1 0.9
P/S 0.96 0.84 2.8 1.8 0.56
ROE 28% 12% 20% 15% 3%
LTD/E 0.36 0 0.28 0 0.40
P/E 13.7 16.6 24 21.5 36
%NM 7% 5% 12% 9% 1.6%
CR 1.4 1.6 1.6 3.4 2.8
Yld 0 0 1.5% 0 0

VAR is Varian Medical. ADAC is ADAC Labs. BCR is CR Bard. OXE is OEC
Medical. SLMD is Spacelab Medical.

CR Bard is the big one, with the multi-billion market cap and standard
big-company numbers. Well managed with all the right ratios. Just
wish it was a little cheaper.

OEC Medical is a turnaround of sorts, and is growing more than VAR.
There's a lot to recommend this stock, but it remains a small player
with more risk than CR Bard. It would have to be cheaper.

Varian is just cheap. World-class tech, and without a lot of direct
compeition in its oncology division. Management is a question mark,
and they don't seem very incentivized to me. 25% of VAR's sales are
in the imaging area - they sell x-ray tubes to most of the world's big
suppliers of x-ray and CT equipment. The funny thing is that all of
these suppliers have their own in-house x-ray tube production. And
they still buy from Varian. In fact, 1/2 of all mammography machines
and 1/4 of all CAT scanners contain Varian tubes! This is both a
threat and a commendation. I view these sales as stable with mild
growth potential.

The oncology group is what's growing, and there's a
software/information technology component to it. The model is akin to
IBM's software for its mainframes. There is an opportunity for
further service revenue via software updates.

For having a ratio analysis that's as good as it is, VAR seems to
trade at a discount to its peers. And it earns a very decent ROE
given its industry. That ROE is probably protected to a degree thanks
to market position/the Varian brand.

Where's the margin of safety? VAR is only growing its top line around
7%, and the results are lumpy. The wild card is the ability to cut
costs and revamp operations now that VAR is free on its own. I see
this as a limited opportunity. Cap ex will remain around 2.5% of
sales, and the opportunity for margin expansion by cutting is probably
capped somewhere below 10%. The real growth will have to keep coming
form the oncology division.

Threats are mainly financial in nature, with reimbursement and a
shrinking health care pie the big issues. This is the reason for the
slump throughout the health care sector.

Still, I'm looking at putting together a mini-portfolio of biotech,
medical device, and care companies as these cos continue to get
cheaper, and VAR would be a nice core holding. I haven't bought
anything yet.

And if one is worried about antiangiogenesis drugs curing cancer, buy
a tiny dollop of ENMD to pair to a full position in VAR. If this
hypothesis is even halfway correct, the ENMD profits will more than
make up for any loss in VAR.

Good investing,
Mike
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext