Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT

GSAT 62.88

-0.5%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (3958)	4/18/1999 6:40:00 PM
From: RMiethe	Read Replies (1) of 29987

Maurice-- You seem to misrepresent Reynen Readware's understanding of battery and or power function in a satellite. Not that it matters personally to me, but he is not here to reply. See my post of his Skybridge paper (Reply# 5434). Let me quote the sentence "In our four prior papers (one on narrowband) we had detailed our expectations for satcom telephony through CDMA satellite power conserving accomplishments for the Globalstar constellation. Path diversity and CDMA (which gives the LEO a 4-fold compression to make the Globalstar capacity the most economic and cost flexible) we saw as its lead over other proposed mobile systems". "CDMA satellite power conserving accomplishments". Seems to me that phrase has in mind exactly what your post states was an issue Reynen Readware thought should be left to satellite companies willy-nilly. The statement, in a Skybridge paper no less, shows that the reference in your post is incorrect. In the end it does not matter so much as Readware is not here to reply to what has been said in your post. But his paper, that I posted, is here to reply. While I appreciate your various explanations on the satellite industry, I am not clear on why you would seek to single him out, especially since what you ascribe to him, as the Skybridge paper indicates, is wrong. Everyone is entitled to views without malice being cast upon them-- and even more so if the malice is incorrectly placed.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next