SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Barrick Gold (ABX)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Enigma who wrote (1162)4/19/1999 10:32:00 AM
From: mineman  Read Replies (1) of 3558
 
As gold slips in priced below $280/oz Barrick's technical people will re-evaluate the Bulyanhulu project and have a hard time justifying spending $200 million to develop it to production.

The .3 ounce underground vein will have high dilution because of the undulating shear structures enclosed by the similar-acting dark siltstone wallrock which will reduce the millhead grade to below .3 oz/t. The ore will need to be ground to -500 mesh to release the gold which will add considerably to the power and steel costs, and the shipping costs for the copper-gold concentrate will be very high.

This purchase will go down in history alongside the Placer-Dome Mt. Milligan blunder showing how slick smooth-talking promoters can persuade non-technical executives for even the largest companies to purchase marginal to uneconomic properties before the company's technical people have been able to sufficiently review the data.

Barrick could have used $200 million of the $520 they spent to buy the good grade, large, open-pittable Argenina Gold project and used the other $320 to develop it, but instead bought this low-grade, high-cost erratic vein in remote Africa.

A clue showing the real reason this deal was negotiated may be found in how Barrick's executives made the almost-unheard-of decision to not include a 'due-diligence' clause in the agreement!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext