Billy Boy, with so many "3rd Party" attacks from you to choose from, why should I bother? Let's just take today's example, it's much easier to look up. Aside from the obvious example of your long exchange with Allen yesterday, there's this, from another forum, where I used to hang out:
To: Les Horowitz (23244 )
From: Bill Vaughn Tuesday, Apr 20 1999 10:23AM ET
Reply # of 23265
Still looking for a recent poll on Clinton's "Justice" department intervening in free capital markets.https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=9026939
I still don't understand why you guys are so worried about polls these days, when they were always dismissed with a wave of the hand while impeachment was going on. Anyway, note the time above, as compared to:
To: Daniel Schuh (43013 )
From: Bill Vaughn Tuesday, Apr 20 1999 11:54AM ET
Reply # of 43066
Another 3rd person attack. What is wrong with you, PHONY?
Who's the PHONY? Who's the hypocrite? Who's the little liar? Not to mention lurker. Maybe you might converse with brees about that.
I lurked on him at a stock thread that I had no interest in. I felt like a peeping Tom. I didn't like the feeling. Not my cup of tea at all. I'm thinking of joining Lurking Tom's anonymous. I don't want SI people showing up at my office to rant about clintonian politics. Seems like the same thing. Message 8942390
Of course, brees is a decent sort, as opposed to some hypocritical little liars around here.
|
